Assessing Model Adequacy

نویسندگان

  • Michael Goldstein
  • Allan Seheult
  • Ian Vernon
چکیده

Environmental models are simplified representations of complex physical systems. The implementation of any such model, as a computer simulator, involves further simplifications and approximations. The value of the resulting simulator, in giving scientific and practical insights into the functioning of the corresponding physical system, depends both on the nature and degree of these simplifications and also on the objectives for which the model is to be used. This chapter provides an introduction to some basic general techniques for assessing the adequacy of a computer model for its intended purpose. There are many ways to approach this question. We will take the view that the aim of the model is to provide some, necessarily partial, information about the behaviour of the system, and we will consider the model adequate for an intended task if the information that is provided by the simulator is sufficient to allow us to carry out this task. We would usually prefer precise forecasts of system behaviour but we may often be able to tolerate probabilistic forecasts, provided that we are able to quantify the level of uncertainty with which these forecasts should be interpreted, and to confirm that this uncertainty is not so large as to prevent us from achieving our objectives. This will, inevitably, be a pragmatic judgement. Therefore, in our account, we will outline some basic methods for assessing the degree of uncertainty that it would be reasonable to associate with model outcomes. It is beyond the scope of this account to produce precise quantifications of predictive uncertainty, as such analysis requires rather more technical machinery than we have space to describe. Instead, we offer some basic tools for making order of magnitude quantifications for such uncertainties, which should indicate whether the limitations of the model are likely to render it unfit for the task at hand. This is by no means a complete account, even for our stated goal, as such analysis is strongly dependent both on the scientific context and also on the size and complexity of the model. In the next section, we outline the general methods that we suggest and, in the following sections, we illustrate how the methods can be used in practice, by applying them to a rainfall runoff model.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Assessing the factors affecting liquidity by focusing on the capital adequacy ratio of the banking network and its asymmetric effects

Liquidity , as the most important variable of the money market , has a significant role in economic performance from various aspects and therefore it is important to identify the factors affecting liquidity. Considering that one of the channels to increase liquidity is loans paid by the banking network and the effective role of capital adequacy ratio in the payment of bank loans, in the present...

متن کامل

Goodness-of-Fit Tests and Model Diagnostics for Negative Binomial Regression of RNA Sequencing Data

This work is about assessing model adequacy for negative binomial (NB) regression, particularly (1) assessing the adequacy of the NB assumption, and (2) assessing the appropriateness of models for NB dispersion parameters. Tools for the first are appropriate for NB regression generally; those for the second are primarily intended for RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) data analysis. The typically small n...

متن کامل

Assessing local model adequacy in Bayesian hierarchical models using the partitioned deviance information criterion

Many diagnostic tools and goodness-of-fit measures, such as the Akaike information criterion (AIC) and the Bayesian deviance information criterion (DIC), are available to evaluate the overall adequacy of linear regression models. In addition, visually assessing adequacy in models has become an essential part of any regression analysis. In this paper, we focus on a spatial consideration of the l...

متن کامل

Bayesian Meta-Reasoning: Determining Model Adequacy from within a Small World

This paper presents a Bayesian framework for assessing the adequacy of a model without the necessity of explicitly enumerating a specific alternate model. A test statistic is developed for tracking the performance of the model across repeated problem instances. Asymptotic methods are used to derive an approximate distribution for �he. t�st statistic. When the model is rejected, the mdtvtdual co...

متن کامل

Model Adequacy and the Macroevolution of Angiosperm Functional Traits.

Making meaningful inferences from phylogenetic comparative data requires a meaningful model of trait evolution. It is thus important to determine whether the model is appropriate for the data and the question being addressed. One way to assess this is to ask whether the model provides a good statistical explanation for the variation in the data. To date, researchers have focused primarily on th...

متن کامل

PuMA: Bayesian analysis of partitioned (and unpartitioned) model adequacy

SUMMARY The accuracy of Bayesian phylogenetic inference using molecular data depends on the use of proper models of sequence evolution. Although choosing the best model available from a pool of alternatives has become standard practice in statistical phylogenetics, assessment of the chosen model's adequacy is rare. Programs for Bayesian phylogenetic inference have recently begun to implement mo...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2010